Help keep the site up to date, volunteer to translate!
De boycot campagne
Waarom een Boycot?
Onderteken de verklaring
Bush Sponsers
Alternatieve producten
Maak deze boycot bekend
Download boycot materiaal
Brief aan de bedrijven
Frequently asked questions
Help ons met de campagne
Laatste Nieuws
Huidige Boycotactie
Internationaal Overzicht
VS boycot van atoomteststop verdrag Coalitie van NGOs roept op tot boycot VS producten (3/9/2003)
Boycot acties in Belgi‘ 14 juni 2003
Fotos
Internationale Boycot Actie Dag (15/4/2003)
IPB joins global call
ACTIE! Esso en Texaco blokkade
(2/4/2003)
ACTIE! Esso en Texaco blokkade
(26/3/2003)
Boycotcampagne in Belgi‘
De bedrijven die we boycotten
Wapenproducenten
Wapenproducenten die ook huishoudartikelen produceren
General Electric (Hotpoint, and other appliances)
Olie
De banden tussen de oliesector en de oorlog in Irak
ExxonMobil/Esso
ChevronTexaco
Autobedrijven en luchtvaartmaatschappijen
Driving the oil economy
Cadillac, Chevrolet, Dodge, Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler and Lincoln
Alaska Airlines, Aloha Airlines, America West, American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, TWA, United
Airlines, USAir
Symbolen van het VS imperialisme
Sommige bedrijven zijn gewoon evidente doelen...
Altria (Philip Morris, Kraft)
Pepsico (Pepsi, Starbucks)
Coca-Cola
McDonalds
Geef ons suggesties over andere bedrijven
Achtergrond informatie
Links
|
|
Boycott oil US products
Despite the Bush administration’s claims that the proposed war on Iraq is only about
weapons of mass destruction, simmering below the surface is Bush’s ‘need’ to secure
a continued supply of cheap oil.
While oil is not the only factor motivating Bush’s preparations for war, US oil
dependency is playing a large part in fuelling conflict in the Middle East region.
Iraq is sitting on 10% of the world’s oil reserves - 112bn barrels, second only to Saudi
Arabia. That’s 16 years worth of US oil consumption. It is only currently producing
a fraction of that potential, and large sectors of Iraqi territory have never been fully
explored, so there is a good chance that their actual reserves may be far greater. The
US Department of Energy recently confirmed that ‘Iraq's oil production costs are
amongst the lowest in the world, making it a highly attractive oil prospect.’
Now US energy policy is setting the path for the nation’s foreign policy. Yet there
are alternative routes. As Peter Hain, UK Foreign Office Minister of State, has said:
‘There is no better way to enhance our energy security, and thus to increase our
ability to pursue our broader foreign policy objectives, than by finding innovative and
cost-effective ways to reduce our dependence on oil as a transport fuel. Doing so
would also have the added benefit of boosting other domestic and foreign policy
objectives, particularly those on air quality and climate change.’
The company that has done more than any other to keep the US hooked on oil is
ExxonMobil (known as Esso in the UK and Europe). In order to protect its business
in fossil fuels, ExxonMobil has spent the last decade sabotaging international action
on climate change and directing US climate and energy policy. It has made concerted
efforts to undermine the accepted scientific consensus on climate change, and is still
misleading the public and policy makers over the economic implications of tackling
global warming. It has also funded ‘climate sceptic’ scientists and industry front
groups to lobby on its behalf. When Bush pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol in 2001,
ExxonMobil was the architect of his climb-down.
For More information:
Stop Esso
Another large US oil multinational, based in Texas, already subject to a boycott because of it's environmental and human rights record. It also stands to gain a significant amount from a change in regime in Iraq.
For More information:
Corporate Watch: ChevronTexaco boycott
|
|